Do celebrities adopt children just for the sake of positive publicity that they get by portraying such compassionate acts or do they really care for these unfortunate kids? I really do have doubts whether their intentions are purely humanitarian. After Angelina Jolie???s adoption spree is finally over (now she is contemplating on biological babies I guess), now it is turn for the infamous star Vivica Fox.
I entirely feel post publication of her controversial sex tapes out in the public, it is a well-planned strategic move to receive some encouraging media attention. Other than this, I really do not find a reason for Vivica, who is also a heavy drinker, to suddenly start feeling empathetic towards any social cause. And guess what? The logic she is putting forward for adopting a kid is that she does not want to bear a child naturally, because if her relationship with its father does not work out, then the child will only remain as a painful reminder of that failed relationship.
Phew! Surely Vivica has worked hard on her logical reasoning classes. If Tom Cruise and Angelina Jolie have proved to be good foster parents, it does not mean even you can do the same Vivica. And after reports of your ongoing scandals and gossips, we are sure you are not even capable of. I guess there is no dearth of genuinely kindhearted people in the world who feel concerned for such orphans or poor kids from the bottom of their heart. They adopt them not to capture media headlines but to provide them with a new, better life. I pray there is more such unpretentious people in the world.
Source: celebitchy
