“Men are infidel by nature. They are always in search of ‘other lucrative greener pastures’. That’s why all women favoring laws are designed, so that wife gets social security along with financial security.”
I come across this comment and other similar gestures, whenever I oppose gender biased one sided laws. And as I thought over it, I find it very interesting to discuss this topic: infidelity of men. The word “infidelity” is favorite of feminists, which makes easier for them to demand more and more biased laws over this point. This one is also favorite of young girls, to give them enough material to blame boys for breakage of relationships. But as I fight against gender biased laws which are mostly matrimonial, let us consider infidelity of husband.
Definition of infidelity in dictionary: Infidelity occurs when a person who is married or in a steady relationship has sex with some other person.
Now feminists’ view, that most husbands are infidel, so pro women laws are necessary.
I want to give feminists a full chance, and much to their pleasure let us assume that 100% of husbands are infidel. It means that 100% of husbands are having sex with some other person who is not his wife. (according to oxford definition of “infidelity”). And so 100% of Indian wives require social and financial security.
Now where do this 100% husbands go for having sexual relation with some other person? And who are those some other persons? (Feminists cant say that all husbands are homosexuals and so they all enjoy internally, because gay men are not so much in number yet. They can’t even say that all husbands are having “animal sex”, because definition of infidelity says ‘person’ and not ‘animal’.)
Of course, they all must be going to some women. It means that there are some women who are having sex with married men. These women can be of two types: 1. married and 2. single.
1.Under this category these married women having sex with those married men, are also infidel. (sorry feminists, its in the definition)
2. Now single women having sex with married men… what do you think? Are they innocent like “holy ganga river”? Again for the feminists pleasure, let us assume that single women having sex with married men are fooled by those men and they don’t know about those men being married. But hey, it’s year 2010, are these women so stupid to have sex with some men whose background is not known to them? And if they have sex without knowing such background…. we can’t consider them innocent.
So when this single women will be married, we can’t expect any loyalty from them towards their husband. Of course, they will be infidel.
If we get very liberal to women, and fully support feminists then also above consideration may give us at least 85-90 infidel married women per 100 infidel married men. Formulating gender biased laws over this point of “infidelity” is a mischievous agenda of feminists. They are not only misguiding society to spread feeling of man hatred all over, but also scaring young girls so that they lose faith in boys or men and never trust them. These seeds of insecurity in young school and college girls, not only grow as hatred towards men but also poor foundation of our age old marriage and family system. It’s a social crime of feminists.
